Sunrise Senior Living Case 1/16/2007

To have your information reviewed for options and to recieve notifications about this case, please use this form. You may also send an email to mail@shareholdersfoundation.com, or call us at (858) 779-1554.
Company Name(s): 
Sunrise Senior Living
Case Name: 
Sunrise Senior Living Case 1/16/2007
Case Status: 
Lawsuit Filed
Case Status: 
Judgment Issued
Case Status: 
Settlement Proposed
Case Status: 
Settlement Approved
Affected Securities
NYSE: SRZ
Lawsuit Overview
Type of Lawsuit: 
Shareholder Class Action
Date Filed: 
01/16/2007
Class Period Begin: 
02/26/2004
Class Period End: 
07/28/2006
Court of Filing: 
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Settlement Amount: 
$13,500,000
Deadline to Participate in Settlement: 
07/27/2009
Summary: 

Case Update - 05/05/2009

Plaintiffs filed a Stipulation of Settlement on February 27, 2009, outlining a $13.5 million agreement to release defendants of pending claims. According to the firms annual report for year 2008, the majority of the settlement will be funded by insurance.

Original Post - 11/26/2008

According to a press release dated January 16, 2007, the complaint charges Sunrise and certain of its officers and directors with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Sunrise provides residential and other services to retirees and elderly persons through facilities it develops and constructs and then manages, often through joint ventures.
The complaint alleges that during the Class Period, defendants issued materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company’s business, its stock option plans, its compensation practices and its financial results. As a result of these false statements, Sunrise’s common stock traded at artificially inflated prices during the Class Period, reaching a high of $39.68 per share on March 29, 2006. The individual defendants took advantage of Sunrise’s falsified financial results, the artificial inflation of Sunrise’s stock and the manipulation of its stock option plans by selling shares of their Sunrise stock for illegal insider trading proceeds of over $34 million, while Sunrise’s top officers pocketed millions more in unjustified bonus payments enhanced in part by Sunrise’s falsified profits. The complaint alleges that defendants had previously manipulated the Company’s stock option plans so as to enrich themselves by “backdating” or “spring-loading” the stock options they were granted.
The complaint further alleges that on May 9, 2006, Sunrise disclosed a delay in reporting its first quarter 2006 results to allow a review of its financial statements, and on July 31, 2006, Sunrise revealed it would be forced to restate its financial statements going back several years - at least to 1999 - and that its prior financial statements could no longer be relied upon. Sunrise also admitted it could not file current period financial statements for the first, second and third quarters of 2006 and that when it restated its financial results, at least $100 million of previously reported profits from its joint ventures and real estate sales would be eliminated. As these revelations unfolded, Sunrise’s stock fell from $39.62 on May 8, 2006 to as low as $24.40 on July 31, 2006.